-
CEO/Owner/top management actively participates in safety program (i.e., leads safety meeting, conducts site safety walk, recognizes employees for safety efforts, communications, etc.)
-
Top management instills personal accountability for safety throughout company. (i.e. safety violation write-ups)
-
Commits reasonable resources (money, time) to achieve goals. (i.e. receipts, trainings, equipment, shoe reimbursement program, etc.)
-
Top management integrates safety into all facets of company operations. (i.e. newsletters, communication, minutes, trainings, etc.)
-
Top management understands the requirements of the GRIP retro program. (i.e., understanding of expectations, trainings, etc.)
|
-
Top management participates in safety program
-
Personal accountability for safety is expected, but accountability/enforcement is inconsistently applied
-
Top management provides the required safety resources for compliance
-
Top management is familiar but does not understand requirements of the GRIP retro program
|
-
Top management supports safety but does not actively participate in program
-
Little personal accountability for safety just a “be safe” culture
-
Top management provides limited resources for safety
-
Top management has little or no understanding of the GRIP retro program
|
-
Top management is not involved in safety process and demonstrates little interest
-
Safety left to office administrator or site supervisory personnel to handle “as needed”
-
No accountability for safety
-
Little or no funding for safety activities
-
Top management is not aware of GRIP retro program
|