- CEO/Owner/top management actively participates in safety program (i.e., leads safety meeting, conducts site safety walk, recognizes employees for safety efforts, communications, etc.)
- Top management instills personal accountability for safety throughout company. (i.e. safety violation writeups)
- Top management integrates safety into all facets of company operations. (i.e. newsletters, communication, minutes, trainings, etc.)
- Top management understands the requirements of the WFIA retro program. (i.e., understanding of expectations, trainings, etc.)
|
- Top management participates in safety program
- Personal accountability for safety is expected, but accountability/enforcement is inconsistently applied
- Top management provides the required safety resources for compliance
- Top management is familiarbut does not understand requirements of the WFIA retro program
|
- Top management supports safety but does not actively participate in program
- Little personal accountability for safety just a “be safe” culture
- Top management provides limited resources for safety
- Top management has little or no understanding of the WFIA retro program
|
- Top management is not involved in safety processand demonstrates little interest
- Safety left to office administrator or site supervisory personnel to handle “as needed”
- No accountability for safety
- Little or no funding for safety activities
- Top management is not aware of WFIA retro program
|